Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France

Juliana Bidadanure

Abstract


This paper reconstitutes and addresses critically the deontological and consequentialist arguments given by the French government to justify the denial of the national guaranteed minimum income support (RSA) to young people under 25 years old. The deontological arguments express a concern for distributive justice and suggest that young people do not deserve income support. The consequentialist arguments, on the other hand, emphasise social efficiency: they draw on the alleged negative outcomes that the extension of income support to young people would bring about. After analysing each argument, this paper concludes that the denial of RSA to young people is an illegitimate discrimination. It then proposes that we understand our duties towards young people through an account of prudence that reconciles both (1) concerns of distributive justice with concerns for social efficiency and (2) concerns for inter- and intragenerational justices.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Stewart, B (1999): Low Pay, No Pay Dynamics. In: Hills, J (ed.): Persistent Poverty and Lifetime Inequality. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), ch. 10.

Bailey, N (2006): Does Work Pay? Employment, Poverty and Exclusion from Social Relations. In Levitas. R, Gordon. D, Pantazis. C (eds.): Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey. Bristol: The Policy Press, 163-191.

Berton, R (2007): La discrimination méritocratique est-elle injuste? In : Revue de Philosophie Economique. Vol. 8 (1/2007) 47-72.

Chauvel, L (2010): The Long-Term Destabilization of Youth, Scarring Effects, and the Future of the Welfare Regime in Post-Trente Glorieuses France. In: French Politics, Culture & Society. Vol. 28 (3/2010), 74-96.

Commission de concertation sur la politique de la jeunesse (2009) : Reconnaitre la valeur de la jeunesse, Synthese des propositions de la commission. http://www.lagenerationactive.fr/files/LivreVertSynthese_web0907.pdf. Viewed 2010.

Cook, F (1979): Who Should Be Helped: Public Support for Social Services. Berverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Cummiskey, D (1987): Desert and Entitlement. A Rawlsian Consequentialist Account. In: Analysis. Vol. 47 (1/1987), 15-19.

Daniels, N (1988): Am I My Parent’s Keeper? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dean, H / Taylor-Gooby, P (1992): Culture, Structure and Failure: The Underclass Debate. Dependency Culture: The Explosion of a Myth. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 26-50.

Dubet, F / Veretout, A (2001) : Une « réduction » de la rationalité de l'acteur. Pourquoi sortir du RMI ? In : Revue Francaise de Sociologie. Vol. 42 (3/2001), 407-436.

Farvaque, N / Salais, R (2003): Implementing Allowances for Young People in Difficulty in France: Enhancing Capabilities or Increasing Selectivity? In: Standing, G (ed.): Minimum income schemes in Europe. Geneva: International Labour Organisation, 55-72.

Glotzbach, S / Baumgärtner, S (2009): The Relationship between Intragenerational and Intergenerational Ecological Justice. Working Paper Series in Economics no. 141. University of Lüneburg, Germany.

Goodin, R (1995): Basic income. Utilitarianism as a Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228-244.

Gouvernement (2009) : Revenu de solidarite active, Dossier de Presse. http://www.rsa.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/DP_rSa_un_an_apres_le_vote_de_la_loi-2.pdf. Viewed August 2006.

Grandguillot, D (2009) : RSA, Revenue De Solidarité Active. Paris: Gualino.

Guigou et al. (2002) : Pour une autonomie responsable et solidaire, Rapport au Premier Ministre. Paris: La documentation Francaise.

HALDE (2008) : Délibération n° 2008-228 du 20 octobre 2008. http://www.halde.fr/IMG/pdf/2008-228.pdf. Viewed August 2010.

Hills, J (1999): Persistent Poverty and Lifetime Inequality: The Evidence. London: CASE.

Jay, C (24 Jan 2011) : Les études supérieures de moins en moins accessibles aux enfants d'ouvriers. La Tribune.

Landré (16 Oct. 2011) : Le RSA Jeunes sera réformé en Décembre. Le Figaro.

Layard, R (2004): Good Jobs and Bad Jobs. London: Centre for Economic Performance.

Leparmentier, A (28 Sep. 2009) : Le nouveau plan pour préserver les jeunes de la précarité sociale. Le Monde.

Martin, J (2009) : RSA a minima pour les jeunes : Sarkozy ménage son camp. http://www.rue89.com/2009/09/29/sarkozy-fabrique-un-rsa-jeunes-a-minima-pour-menager-son-camp. Viewed August 2010.

Michaud, Y (2009) : Qu'est-ce que le Mérite? Paris: Bourin.

Mongin, P (2008) : Faut-il attribuer le revenu de solidarite active a 18 ans? Les cahiers de la recherche. No. 911.

OECD (2010): How does your country compare – France. http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3746,en_2649_33927_43219249_1_1_1_1,00.html. Viewed February 2012.

Oorschot, W. V (2000) : Who Should Get What and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity Among the Public. In: Policy & Politics. Vol 28 (1/2000), 33-48.

Oshana, M (2006): Personal autonomy in society. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Rawls, J (2003): The Problem of Justice between Generations. A Theory of Justice. Harvard: Harvad University Press, 251-259.

Rollot, C / Floch, B (25 Aug. 2010) : Le RSA jeunes, une "politique sociale ciblée". In : Le monde. http://abonnes.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2010/08/25/le-rsa-jeunes-une-politique-sociale-ciblee_1402458_3224.html. Viewed August 2010.

Sarkozy, N (2009) : Agir pour la jeunesse. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xan9fd_avec-le-rsa-jeunes-m-sarkozy-brise_news. Viewed August 2010.

Scheffler, S (1988): Consequentialism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Secours Catholique (2010): Jeunes, une génération précaire. http://www.secours-catholique.org/IMG/pdf/Dp_Stats2010-2-2.pdf. Viewed February 2012.

Senat (2009): Projet de loi de finances pour 2010 : Solidarité, insertion et égalité des chances. http://www.senat.fr/rap/l09-101-330/l09-101-3303.html. Viewed August 2010

Swaan, D (1988): In Care of the State. Amsterdam: Bakker.

Van Parijs, P (2000): A Basic Income for All. In: Boston Review (Oct-Nov/2000).

White, S (2003): The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Will, J (1993): The Dimensions of Poverty: Public Perceptions of the Deserving Poor. In: Social Science Research (22/1993) 312-32.

Wolff, J (2007): Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.6.1.462

Copyright (c) 2016 Intergenerational Justice Review



Tübingen Open Journals – Privacy Protection